_entertainment   popular-culture

Popular Actor's Controversial Appearance In Political Ads

by Michele Cheplic | More from this Blogger

25 Oct 2006 12:53 PM

I think I have seen actor Michael J. Fox on TV more in the last day or so than I did when he appeared on "Family Ties" (the NBC sitcom that made him famous). Chock it up to Election Day and the fact that the award-winning actor has been tapped to appear in a slew of 30-second TV ads (airing on television and on the Internet) for five Democrats who support stem cell research, including Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle (I live in Wisconsin and the governor's race is a hotly contested battle).

Ironically, the symptoms of Parkinson's disease that all but ended Fox's acting career are making him a powerfully vulnerable campaign pitchman for Rep. Benjamin L. Cardin, who is running for the Senate in Maryland, Senate candidate Claire McCaskill in Missouri and the aforementioned Doyle, all who support stem cell research.

In the McCaskill ad, which has been viewed by more than 1 million people on YouTube.com, Fox tells voters, "What you do in Missouri matters to millions of Americans. Americans like me."

The fact that Fox appears on behalf of the candidates is not what is causing the controversy. It is a known fact that celebrities have a long history of supporting political candidates. Though many agree that Fox, who campaigned for John Kerry in the 2004 presidential race, is uniquely suited as a spokesman for embryonic stem cell research, which some scientists believe could aid in discovering treatments or cures to Parkinson's and other diseases.

What is causing all the commotion is the fact that Fox shakes and rocks as he directly addresses the camera, the effects of his disease clearly apparent. Some conservatives have criticized Fox's ads as exploitive. Recently, commentator Rush Limbaugh claimed Fox was "either off his medication or acting" during the ad.

That comment naturally set off a round of retorts from those who defend Fox and call his appearance as "aggressive campaigning for a Parkinson's cure." Dr. John Boockvar, a neurosurgeon and assistant professor at Weill Cornell Medical Center at New York's Presbyterian Hospital, told reporters at a recent press conference that Limbaugh's claim that Fox was acting was simply "ludicrous." The doctor went on to say: "If there is one single disease that has the highest potential for benefit from stem cell research it's Parkinson's."

You'll recall Fox was diagnosed with Parkinson's in 1991, but waited seven years before revealing his condition to the public. In 2000, the "Spin City" and "Back to the Future" star quit full-time acting and founded the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, which has raised millions of dollars. In the years since, Fox has taken smaller acting roles, such as in a several-episode guest appearance earlier this year on ABC's "Boston Legal," playing a business tycoon with cancer.

 
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Learn more about Michele Cheplic
MaliaMom`s avatar

Michele Cheplic was born and raised in Hilo, Hawaii, but now lives in Wisconsin. Michele graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Madison with a degree in Journalism.

View Full Profile | More from this Blogger


Relevantpopular culture tags

User Comments

mommytotwo (526) 25 Oct 2006 03:26 PM

These ads are running non-stop down here in MO and I have to say, they are effective. If I wasn't already a supporter of stem cell research (which I am!), then I could perhaps be easily swayed by seeing Michael J. Fox twitching and moving uncontrollably in these ads thanks to his Parkinsons. Just knowing that this research could potentially help him sends a message. I am not sure where Rush Lindbaugh gets off judging anyone at all with all that he has done recently that has been in the press. LOL!

Valorie Delp Online! (49083) 25 Oct 2006 05:07 PM

I have to agree with you Kaye with regards to R.L. And I am not in favor of stem cell research either, per se. First of all, I'm not sure what's so wrong with the ads--of course they're using someone with a condition to promote a message! Isn't that what you do? I'm not sure why that's a bad thing--rather I think it's just effective advertising. In my book the ads are a lot more ethical of a promotion than Rush Limbaugh's brand of promotion anyhow. And you're right Kaye--how does he get to be judge?

Libby Pelham (12397) 26 Oct 2006 11:09 AM

What is it Al Franken said about Rush Limbough? Oh yea, he's a big fat idiot :-)

Michele Cheplic Online! (36005) 27 Oct 2006 06:23 AM

Kaye, Valorie and Libby--thanks for the comments. I have to write a follow up now that Fox sat down with Katie Couric to defend himself--which I don't think he should have been made to do!

Valorie Delp Online! (49083) 27 Oct 2006 07:49 AM

I know--I saw that! Although I wonder if it was more Katie wanting to promote her own agenda as much as it was Fox wanting to defend himself.

Community Tags

, , , ,

Discuss this article

You must be logged in to tag, rate, or comment on this item. Not registered? Register now, it's free and only takes a minute.



Signup for or free community and join the conversation with 441,107 registered users active members!
Username
Password
Email
Birth Date
Gender Female Male
Agree to terms of use.

More popular culture tags

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe | Blog For Us! | Be a Moderator! | Advertise with Us | Help